This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008 at 3:23 pm and is filed under Helmets, Motorcycle, Safety. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
December 3, 2008
About half of all motorcycles involved in a fatal crash collided with another vehicle. There are a number of reasons for this. Fatigue, talking on cell phones, they are just in too much of a hurry, a motorcycle is smaller and harder to judge the speed and distance. I am sure that there are a lot more reason but you get my drift. Now then lets investigate just how many of the 4,798 people that died in 2006 from a motorcycle crash had helmets on.
First Id like to say that head injury is a leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates an un-helmeted rider is 40 percent more likely to suffer a fatal head injury and 15 percent more likely to incur a nonfatal head injury than a helmeted motorcyclist.
According to FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System) helmet use among fatally injured motorcyclists is below 50 percent. But on the same note according to NHTSA Reported helmet use for fatally injured motorcyclists in 2005 were 58 percent of operators and 50 percent for passengers, compared with 56 percent and 47 percent, respectively, in 2004.
Here is another perspective to consider.
Warren Woodward, Chair, State Legislative Committee Street Bikers United Hawaii States;
“NHTSA is cherry picking data. In the opening summary, motorcycle fatalities are presented as a crisis: “Since 1997 motorcycle rider fatalities have increased 89%.” Wow, sounds bad, but over the years I have received many solicitations from investment newsletters. As a result I’ve learned how easy it is to pick certain time frames to make profits look good. It’s called cherry picking and it’s what NHTSA is doing here. Go back 15 years, since 1990, and fatalities have only increased 24%. If you go back 25 years, from 1980 to 2004, the fatalities actually decrease 22%”
“So instead of starting out the report with a horrifying 89% increase in fatalities, NHTSA could have begun by saying that since 1980 motorcycle fatalities have dropped 22%. But then there’s no crisis, and we wouldn’t need to be saved, or at least not by them.”
Warren also states that a chart on page 36 of the NHTSA 72 page report shows that the helmet use rate in fatal crashes was basically unchanged for over ten years, from 1995 to 2004. “If helmets “save lives”, shouldn’t more of the dead be helmet less, especially as fatalities rose 89%? Yet helmeted riders consistently comprise the dead majority at around 54% of fatalities every year. Of course that doesn’t stop NHTSA from calling for mandatory helmet laws.” ” Ultimately, the helmet numbers are useless because they do not reflect anything except how many were wearing and how many were not at time of death.”
I have just begun to scratch the surface of this controversial debate. I am sure that if you search and dig into the meat of this issue you can find as many pros as there are cons. In the end what it finally comes down to is what is best for you. It should be you that decides. After all isn’t that what freedom is really all about.
For sources information please refer to http://www.msf-usa.org and http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov also Fabricating Trends in Fatal Motorcycle Crashes by Warren Woodward at Steel Horse News & Classifieds.
Article curtesy of ezinearticles.com author Michael Walrath
Disclaimer: www.motorcycle-leather-gear.com and www.openroadcyclegear.com are wholey owned by RobyCo, Inc. of Reading Pennsylvania. Excerpt articles do not represent the management opinions of RobyCo, Inc or its holdings. Selected information is provided for discussion purposes.